Friday, December 26, 2008

A stimulus package I could live with.

This is a stimulus package I could deal with.  The best part of it is, is the government doesn’t even need to come up with any money.

The National Retail Federation called for three periods of sales tax-free shopping that would last 10 days each in March, July and October 2009. The trade group estimates that it would save consumers about $20 billion, or $175 per family.

 

Cut taxes and people will have more money to spend.

Wednesday, December 24, 2008

Scientists say Christmas lights hurt the planet.

So now scientists are warning that Christmas lights are hurting our planet because of all the wasted power being used that has been produced by coal burning power facilities. 

Of course your electric car is still fine.  The electricity for it comes from the outlet on your wall.

Tuesday, December 16, 2008

New York's new Tax plan.

What a plan the New York governor and legislature has come up with.

  • An "iPod tax" that charges state and local sales tax for "digitally delivered entertainment services" - in other words, that new Beyonce song you download.

  • State sales tax at movie theaters, sporting events, taxis, buses, limousines and cable and satellite TV and radio.

  • Costlier driving with the repeal of the 8-cents-per-gallon sales tax cap on motor and diesel motor fuel, plus and increase in the auto rental tax.

  • Tuition increases at SUNY and CUNY, $620 and $600 a year respectively.

  • A 50 cent tax on cigars. The current tax is equal to 37% of the wholesale price, or 34 cents a cigar.

  • No more sales tax break on clothes and shoes worth $110 or less, except during two weeks a year.

  • Higher taxes on wine, beer and flavored malt beverages. He would also impose an 18% tax on non-nutritional drinks like soda.

  • The rich would pay more for luxury items through an additional 5% tax imposed on cars costing more than $60,000, aircraft costing more than $500,000, yachts costing at least $200,000 and jewelry and furs costing in excess of $20,000.

  • In addition, a host of a fees, including those related to motor vehicle licensing and registration, parks and auto insurance, would go up, as would various state-imposed fines.

  • Isn’t New Jersey just across the river from New York.  What keeps people from crossing the river to do their shopping?

    Even with the cuts, the 2009-10 budget would increase a little more than 1%, the smallest hike since 1996-97.

    Paterson said the state is facing a $51 billion shortfall over the next four years at a time when tax revenues are expected to drop 6.6% next year.

    I would expect tax revenues to drop a little more.  But that is just my uneducated opinion.  I would be interested to see if New Jerseys revenues increase this next year.  We shall soon see.

    Friday, December 12, 2008

    If people could only understand.

    If people could only understand a little bit of how our tax system works we would all be better off.  I first found this at brutallyhonest.org

    Suppose that every day, ten men go out for beer and the bill for all ten comes to $100.
    If they paid their bill the way we pay our taxes, it would go something like this:
    The first four men (the poorest) would pay nothing.
    The fifth would pay $1.
    The sixth would pay $3.
    The seventh would pay $7.
    The eighth would pay $12.
    The ninth would pay $18.
    The tenth man (the richest) would pay $59.
    So, that's what they decided to do. The ten men drank in the bar every day and seemed quite happy with the arrangement, until one day, the owner threw them a curve.
    'Since you are all such good customers,' he said, ''I'm going to reduce the cost of your daily beer by $20. Drinks for the ten now cost just $80.'
    The group still wanted to pay their bill the way we pay our taxes so the first four men were unaffected. They would still drink for free. But what about the other six men - the paying customers? How could they divide the $20 windfall so that everyone would get his 'fair share?' They realized that $20 divided by six is $3.33. But if they subtracted that from everybody's share, then the fifth man and the sixth man would each end up being paid to drink his beer. So, the bar owner suggested that it would be fair to reduce each man's bill by roughly the same amount, and he proceeded to work out the amounts each should pay.
    And so:
    The fifth man, like the first four, now paid nothing (100% savings).
    The sixth now paid $2 instead of $3 (33%savings).
    The seventh now paid $5 instead of $7 (28%savings).
    The eighth now paid $9 instead of $12 (25% savings).
    The ninth now paid $14 instead of $18 (22% savings).
    The tenth now paid $49 instead of $59 (16% savings).
    Each of the six was better off than before. And the first four continued to drink for free. But once outside the restaurant, the men began to compare their savings.
    'I only got a dollar out of the $20', declared the sixth man. He pointed to the tenth man,' but he got $10!'
    'Yeah, that's right', exclaimed the fifth man.
    'I only saved a dollar, too. It's unfair that he gotten times more than I!'
    ''That's true!!' shouted the seventh man.
    'Why should he get $10 back when I got only two? The wealthy get all the breaks!'
    'Wait a minute,' yelled the first four men in unison. 'We didn't get anything at all. The system exploits the poor!'
    The nine men surrounded the tenth and beat him up.

    The lesson continues... go now, learn, and pass on especially to your progressive friends though the caveat at the end applies in a big way:

    For those who understand, no explanation is needed
    For those who do not understand, no explanation is possible.

    Sunday, December 7, 2008

    NoMobVeto.org

    The following is an ad ran in the New York times by The Becket Fund for Religious Liberty.  Visit nomobveto.org to add your name in support.

     

    Saturday, December 6, 2008

    Democrat Bail-out.

    Mr Obama is carrying a 30 million dollar surplus after the campaign while many others are in debt.

    I find it a bit amusing that we are electing officials to our government (especially in these economic times) who cannot balance their own budget, let alone our national budget.  I’m not a fan of campaign reform just because I believe in capitalism and freedom.  But just like everything else money corrupts and the true ideals are hidden away.  I also don’t like that our elected officials are living off donations, spending more than the donations they receive and expect someone to help them out. 

    Mr. Obama hold on to your money.  It has been given to you by those who believe in you.  Just because others of your party can’t seem to manage their money does not mean they should get a bail-out as well. 

    Are we going to become a Country of bail-outs or are will we go back to our roots of capitalism and freedom.  Survival of the fittest.  Let the weak die so the strong can continue to carry our great Country.

    Maybe Mr. Obama should ask each of those asking for money to submit a detailed plan of how they are going to properly manage any new funds.  

    Another Obama gimmick?

    Mr.. Obama really has the feel good thing down pat.  So Obama wants to hear Americans idea of health care.  Does he really want to hear it or is it just another “hope and change” gimmick to make his base feel good while he continues on with more of the same. 

    We shall soon see.

    Friday, December 5, 2008

    Bowl Games “The great college tradition”

    So it’s that time of year again and the anticipation is escalating.  Who’s going to be in the BCS championship game.  Who’s going to get the nod for the for the roundup outback weed-eater dot com bowl.  It’s a tradition we can’t live with out.

    Yeah right.  If your not in the BCS you have to try and earn respect that is never going to come.  Just like everything else in our society it’s all about the money.  Just a little proof in the Las Vegas Bowl.  The Las Vegas Bowl has rights to the Mtn. West Champs unless that team is selected to the BCS.  This year Utah is going to a BCS game so naturally the Las Vegas Bowl would choose the next best team in the Mtn West. 

    But…

    But TCU can't match BYU's ability to bring fans, and in troubling economic times it's difficult for a bowl to pass up a full stadium over one with plenty of empty seats.

     

    Tradition.  The only tradition anymore is the relentless search for the greenback.

    Survival of the Fittest

    Capitalism represents the epitome of the "survival of the fittest" theory. At least, it is supposed to. Weak companies dissolve. Strong companies flourish. That is how it is supposed to be. This is what comes to my mind when I think about the bailout of the big three.

    I am also reminded of the nature shows I sometimes watch on National Geographic or other stations. I often hear the folks talking about how sad they were when they saw the lion was all alone and sick and about to die. These folks want so badly to rescue the lion from its death, but they don't. They stand aside and watch it die even though it is a difficult thing for these nature-lovers to do. They do this because they know it is more important to let life take its path, to let nature carry on its purpose.

    The government should learn a lesson from these folks. In this capitalistic society that we have formed and value so greatly, each business has to fend for itself. In the end, it is most beneficial to our society when the weak businesses die off and the strong survive. This is because it is the strong companies that offer the greatest value to society. The government would be doing a disservice to the people of this nation if it bailed out weak (rescued) companies from their self-inflicted demise. The demise of the weak companies helps strong companies emerge.

    Thursday, December 4, 2008

    The bailout once more…

    My question is.  If any one of the big 3 auto producers has a decent business model, why are they going to the government for money?  Isn’t there an investor in the world who would love to invest in this industry if it is so great.

    My answer is they have a horrible business model.  That is why they are begging congress instead of independent investors.  They are bound by horrible business practices and commitments as well as being larger than they are able to handle.  Just like the airline industry did, the auto industry needs to cut back.  Yes people will lose their jobs and that is horrible.  Americans are resilient and will pull through.

    We are looking at troubling times ahead and to put a band-aid on a severed artery will only limit the spurting but do nothing to stop the bleeding.  We are America.  We have been through tough times.  The sooner we fix this and take our punches the sooner we’ll be back on our feet stronger than ever.

    Just remember we are here because God has given us this land.  If we continue to look to Him for guidance and mercy He will bless us.  We have forgotten Him and need to return to our roots and remember it was to God that our founding father looked for guidance in establishing a free democracy.

    God Bless the U.S.A.

    Wednesday, December 3, 2008

    It didn’t work for John Kerry….

    I didn’t work for John Kerry four years ago

    "I'm fascinated by Rap and Hip-Hop" said Democratic presidential candidate, John Kerry during an MTV Choose or Lose forum. Offering up a heavy dose of street credibility, Kerry defended gangsta rap, freedom of speech and the realities of street life.

    "I'm fascinated by rap and by hip-hop. I think there's a lot of poetry in it. There's a lot of anger, a lot of social energy in it. And I think you'd better listen to it pretty carefully, 'cause it's important."

    "I'm still listening because I know that it's a reflection of the street and it's a reflection of life, and I understand all that. I'm not for the government censoring or stepping in. But I don't think it's inappropriate occasionally to talk about what you think is a standard or what you think is a value that is worth trying to live up to."

    So Jim Martin decided to try too.

    The following video may help us understand why.

    Monday, December 1, 2008

    Posse Comitatus Act.

    It is time to learn and be knowledgeable of our Constitution and the laws limiting the reach of government.  The Posse Comitatus Act was established for the cause of limiting executive power, and is possibly being undermined.  More to follow but be aware and school yourself.

    In short.  If the Army, Navy, Marines, or Air Force has been deployed to help protect Americans, it only takes one bad president and supermajority congress to do something unthinkable.   

    Hostages tortured? Nooo….!

    If anyone truly questioned the type of cold blooded murderers we are fighting against, question no more.

    "Bombay has a long history of terror. I have seen bodies of riot victims, gang war and previous terror attacks like bomb blasts. But this was entirely different. It was shocking and disturbing," a doctor said.

     

    Asked specifically if he was talking of torture marks, he said: "It was apparent that most of the dead were tortured. What shocked me were the telltale signs showing clearly how the hostages were executed in cold blood," one doctor said.

    The other doctor, who had also conducted the post-mortem of the victims, said: "Of all the bodies, the Israeli victims bore the maximum torture marks. It was clear that they were killed on the 26th itself. It was obvious that they were tied up and tortured before they were killed. It was so bad that I do not want to go over the details even in my head again," he said.

     

    Where is all the outrage about this?  Why are we not hearing about how these innocent people were brutally tortured and murdered?  Of course we will probably never hear about it because we are the bad guys.

    A senior National Security Guard officer, who had earlier explained the operation in detail to rediff.com, said the commandos went all out after they ascertained that there were no more hostages left. When asked if the commandos attempted to capture them alive at that stage, he replied: "Unko bachana kaun chahega (Who will want to save them)?"

    At least these Indian commando’s took care of business.  They attacked with extreme prejudice.  The only way to deal with terrorists.

    Friday, November 28, 2008

    Synchronized Presidential Debate.

    I know the election is over but here’s a fun little montage. 

    Get the latest news satire and funny videos at 236.com.

    Black Friday Madness!

    What have we become?  Is saving 30% really worth what happened in a Long Island Wal-Mart?  I just don’t understand how all the hassle is worth what people go through to get the next best thing, or to save a few dollars on the next best thing. 

    Black Friday has been properly named though.  Black representing a bad day.  One of which a sane person should stay home, relax, digest Thanksgiving dinner and read the ridiculous articles of how crazed shoppers stayed out all night in the freezing cold so they could be the first to by the next Elmo, or whatever it is this year.

    We definitely have been blessed with plenty.  May God please have mercy upon us and continue to bless our Country.

    Wednesday, November 26, 2008

    It’s about time….People stood up for Thanksgiving.

    A great read.  Maybe there is a little bit of hope in California.  I’m glad someone finally stood up the the elitists trying to take away our holidays.

    Chris Matthews “Who’s in charge?”

    Are you kidding me?  “Who’s in charge right now?”  It seems the only people not sure are the ones who just can’t wait for Obama to be sworn in.  Of course the President is the President until January 20 no matter who it is.  Can you imagine in 4 years if Obama is elected out and the conservative media saying the same things.  The Obasms just continue to get stronger. 

    Tuesday, November 25, 2008

    Unions and Hookers.

    I was reading at glennbeck.com about how he has had to deal with unions and all their crazy rules.  So I googled crazy union rules to see what kind of crazy rules they really have.  I came across the following at http://callhart.com/crazy/2007/04/union-rules-hookers/

    Enjoy.

    Okay, okay .. so the last time you heard this you fell off your dinosaur! I know it’s an oldie, but a goodie .. FWD to me in my email! Thought I would post it anyway :)

    A dedicated Teamsters union worker was attending a convention in Las Vegas and decided to check out the local brothels. When he got to the first one, he asked the Madam,

    Is this a union house?”

    Well, if I pay you $100, what cut do the girls get?”

    “The house gets $80 and the girls get $20,” she answered

    Offended at such unfair dealings, the union man stomped off down the street in search of a more equitable, hopefully unionized shop. His search continued until finally he

    reached a brothel where the Madam responded, “Why yes sir, this is a union house. We observe all union rules.”

    The man asked, “And if I pay you $100, what cut do the girls get?” “The girls get $80 and the house gets $20.” “That’s more like it!” the union man said.

    He handed the Madam $100, looked around the room, and pointed to a stunningly attractive blonde.

    “I’d like her,” he said.

    “I’m sure you would, sir,” said the Madam.

    Then she gestured to a 92-year old woman in the corner, “but Ethel here has 67 years seniority and according to union rules, she’s next.”

    Monday, November 24, 2008

    When will it end…

    My question is, when will all this spending end?  When is someone going to finally stand up and say enough is enough?  Is there no one out there in a position of leadership with the courage to speak out against all this spending?

    So the Washington Post had the following article talking about how another stimulus package could cost as much as $700 billion over the next two years.

    Facing an increasingly ominous economic outlook, President-elect Barack Obama and other Democrats are rapidly ratcheting up plans for a massive fiscal stimulus program that could total as much as $700 billion over the next two years.

    Even House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), whose aides have in recent weeks balked at suggestions that Democrats might spend as much as $300 billion, conceded yesterday on "Face the Nation" that the price of a stimulus package is likely to be "in the several hundred billion dollar category."

    In other articles even President Elect Obama says the crisis will get worse before it gets better. 

    Of course it will.  With all the spending and borrowing, America will need a bail out.  This is when it gets scary because it will be at the mercy of which ever country will help us out.  Moving closer and closer to socialism will be the least of our concerns at that time. 

    My solution.  Halt spending and get back to basics.  If we are to survive as a country, people will have to start making sacrifices.  We have been living high off the hog too long.  Too many are living in excess.  So either we can choose to cut back on our own or we can let the government continue doing what it is doing and soon they will control our spending for us.

    We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

     

    It’s not the governments job to make sure everyone stays in business.  It’s their job to provide for the common defense, insure domestic tranquility and PROMOTE general welfare.  It’s in our constitution, it is what we were founded on and it is through those same principles that we will continue to survive and prosper.

    Enough is enough!

    Saturday, November 22, 2008

    Religion vs. Morals

    Read the article at the link shown. www.huffingtonpost.com/dan-agin/on-politics-religion-and_b_144091.html Then ponder the question: Is there a difference between religion and morals? If so, what is the difference (or are the differences)?

    I love www.dictionary.com. If you look up "religion" at that site, the first definition you get reads: "a set of beliefs concerning the cause, nature, and purpose of the universe, esp. when considered as the creation of a superhuman agency or agencies, usually involving devotional and ritual observances, and often containing a moral code governing the conduct of human affairs." Notice here that a religion generally involves a code of morals, but speaks to many more issues not within the scope of morality.

    If you look up "morals" the first definition you find reads: "of, pertaining to, or concerned with the principles or rules of right conduct or the distinction between right and wrong; ethical."

    One of the great deceptions worked by lawyers and judges across the land is that of confusing the American people about the meaning of the separation of church and state. People like Mr. Agin would have us believe that religion and morals are the exact same thing. They would try to convince us that church and morals are identical and to be banished from all political and government discusses altogether.

    What gets me is Mr. Agin understands and agrees that morals should be, and indeed must be codified, hence his call conclusion that governments should prohibit homicide. Yet he fails to see that one's opinion on gay marriage is also a moral issue, not a religious one. There are many religions, both Christian and non-Christian, that do not support gay marriage. There are athiests and agnostics who oppose gay marriage (I say with personal knowledge).

    What's more, Mr. Agin failed to explain to us exactly how the "religious group...impose[d] its values on other people." Wasn't there a vote on Proposition 8? Wasn't each individual able to vote the way he or she chose? Why is it inappropriate then, given the democracy in which we live, that those who did not support Prop 8 should be subject to the law that was passed? What about those individuals whose morals dictate to them that homicide is acceptable? Is it okay that the majority of the electorate impose their values on them? I see no difference between the two scenarios.

    By the way, Christians should not be labeled one "religious group" in general. There are many religions that believe that Christ was the Savior of the world, including Catholics, Seventh Day Adventists, Baptists, Mormons, etc. Why does Mr. Agin feel compelled to lump all these religions into one group? Because they adhere to a similar, if not the same, code of morals. When it comes to politics, gay marriage is a moral issue, not a religious one.

    Tuesday, November 18, 2008

    Time to get on the Obama bandwaggon.

    Yes, I think it is finally time to get on the Obama bandwaggon.

    Get the latest news satire and funny videos at 236.com.


    Just don't send me to the camps.

    Sunday, November 16, 2008

    What Opponents to Proposition 8 Won’t Admit

    On November 4, 2008, voters in California had the opportunity to vote on Proposition 8. Proposition 8, if enacted, would amend the California Constitution to define marriage as between one man and one woman. It would effectively overturn a 2008 California Supreme Court decision that, for the first time in California’s history, gave individuals the right to marry another of the same sex. The Proposition passed with approximately 52% of the votes.

    The purpose of this article is to analyze the arguments made by the opponents of Proposition 8. The two most common arguments made by those who support same-sex marriage were 1) that the government should not legislate morals and 2) that to deny an individual the ability to marry someone of the same sex is discriminatory, wrong and unfair; therefore, those who support Proposition 8 are bigots. Let’s tackle each of these arguments.

    The first argument was that the government should not legislate morals. This argument is the most astonishing because of its absurdity. One of the primary and most basic roles of government is to legislate morals. Upon typing the word “moral” into http://www.dictionary.com/, the first result you will see reads: “of, pertaining to, or concerned with the principles or rules of right conduct or the distinction between right and wrong; ethical: moral attitudes.” The argument commonly goes something like this: the government should not codify the beliefs of the Christian right because it takes away other people’s beautiful experiences and happiness. So it is wrong to take others’ joyful experiences away from them. Let’s look at a few examples of legislated morals.

    With the first example we can look at driving under the influence of alcohol. Regardless of how much enjoyment people get out of driving while under the influence of alcohol, the government has prohibited and criminalized the act. The vast majority of people agree with the government’s point of view. The voters and the government agree that it is wrong to drink and drive and it is right to penalize someone for doing so. This is a moral judgment legislated.

    Another example involves tax law. There are those who believe that it is appropriate and right that those who make more money should be contributing a larger portion of their income to the common good. Others believe it is appropriate and fair that everyone contribute an equal portion of their income to the common good. These are moral preferences that are legislated.
    It is safe to say that, when pressed, the opponents of Prop 8 would agree that, in fact, the government should legislate morals. They just don’t want morals that differ from theirs to be enacted as legislation; they want their own morals to become law. None of the protestors made a fuss when the California Supreme Court made the law that created the fundamental right of same-sex marriage.

    That brings us to the second argument, which is to deny an individual the ability to marry someone of the same sex is discriminatory, wrong and unfair. If we look for the definition of “discriminate” in http://www.dictionary.com/, we read: “to make a distinction in favor of or against a person or thing on the basis of the group, class, or category to which the person or thing belongs rather than according to actual merit.” The Prop 8 opponents loudly declared that everyone who supported Prop 8 were prejudiced, bigots, and discriminatory. In other words, the opponents lambasted an easily-identifiable class of individuals (supporters of Prop 8) solely because they fell in that category. The biggest problem with this accusation is that the opponents of Prop 8 either did not know what “discriminate” means, or they did know but did not care. To simply support Proposition 8 does not make a person a bigot. If a person says, “I hate gay people; I want them to be unhappy; I do not want them to be able to marry; and therefore I support Proposition 8,” it is safe to say that that person is bigoted because he is making a distinction against a class of people on the basis of the class rather than according to actual merit. However, if an individual says, “I understand the circumstances and hopes of those who wish to enter into same-sex marriages. I also understand the rights already afforded to those in domestic partnerships. I also understand the consequences that will likely result from same-sex marriages. Overall, I am more concerned about the consequences—negative consequences—that will result from allowing same-sex marriage than I am concerned about the consequences of disallowing same-sex marriages,” it is safe to say that that person is not a bigot at all, any more than an individual who says, “I understand the joys that alcoholics get from driving while drunk, and I understand the negative consequences of drunk driving, and I fall down on the side of disallowing drunk driving.” The point here is not to compare drunk driving with same-sex marriages. The point is that with every political issue, voters are faced with a choice of supporting one preference over another preference. Coming down on one side of the issue over another does not make a person a bigot; it makes the person a rational thinker.

    The bottom line is that the arguments opposing Proposition 8 were irrational and inconsistent. It seemed those opposing Prop 8 were only concerned with being heard instead of being persuasive. Assuming an intelligent and informed electorate, Prop 8 was bound to succeed.

    Thursday, November 13, 2008

    My horrible solution to the “Big Three” bail out.

    So the hot topic the past couple of days has been whether or not to bail out the “Big Three”. But does there really need to be a bailout? I mean, if enough people are smart enough, and not care too much about their credit rating going down the drain, I have a solution.

    First we need about 2 million people who have at least $25,000 available credit on their credit card. These people need to all go and buy a brand new car costing at a minimum of $25,000 dollars. This will be infusing the auto industry with over 50 billion dollars. Of course I forgot to mention they all need to be GM, Ford, or Chrysler cars. These people in turn could all default on their credit cards. This debt is unsecured so they will keep their cars, the government will help these credit companies because they can’t fail. Every one wins. People have new cars, The “Big Three” get money and don’t have to change the way they do business, the unions still continue to have way too much power, the credit companies continue to get money so another 2 million people can do the same thing. As long as we have printers and ink, we can keep printing money. Who cares if in a couple of years your Diet Pepsi will cost $10 due to inflation.

    All this can be done without the need of congress to lift a finger and spend endless seconds writing up another bail out bill. Of course that won’t happen because they love having the control and only want more.

    Tuesday, November 11, 2008

    Veterans Day

    Here are just a couple of the many songs and videos that are dedicated to our troops and veterans.  May we remember them in our prayers, especially for all who are forward deployed protecting us from those who wish to destroy our Freedom and our way of life.  May God be with them and their families through their sacrifice. 

    In this election year people can say what they want about our President, George W. Bush.  He has been committed to keeping America safe and has given to those who serve everything possible they need to do the job.  America has even prospered in a time of war, or so we thought.  No one has been asked to give up anything.  Those who have volunteered, have done so knowing they may be giving up everything.  Why?

    There is a scripture in the Book of Mormon that may explain.

    Alma 46:12-13  …In memory of our God, our religion, and freedom, and our peace, our wives, and our children…and he prayed mightily unto his God for the blessings of liberty to rest upon his brethren, so long as there should a band of Christians remain to possess the land.

    Amen.

    Monday, November 10, 2008

    Passing this along…

    US Gravestone

    Found this at brutallyhonest.org

    We shall soon see how everything turns out.

    Obama’s agenda disappears…

    I guess the expectations were too high.  Maybe everyone will forget about how he said he was going to fix everything. 

    • Over the weekend President-elect Barack Obama scrubbed Change.gov….Gone are the promises on how an Obama administration would handle 25 different agenda items….Instead, the official agenda on Change.gov has been boiled down to one vague paragraph proclaiming a plan “to revive the economy, to fix our health care, education, and social security systems, to define a clear path to energy independence, to end the war in Iraq responsibly and finish our mission in Afghanistan, and to work with our allies to prevent Iran from developing a nuclear weapon, among many other domestic and foreign policy objectives.”

    Obama's Agenda

    If McDonalds can do it….

    If McDonalds can do it, why are not more companies following their principles. Lower cost invites more consumers, inevitably increasing income. It would be a great day if the government would finally understand this. Starbucks obviously hasn’t figured it out yet either.

    McDonalds profits increase.

    Starbucks profits drop.

    One more opinionated Blog! by Rick

    So here I am. Just wanting to add my 2 bits to everyone elses. Really, I know not many will listen, but I want to yell it out anyway.